Eddie Groves sprints from shareholders after 2006 EGM

By Stephen Mayne
January 17, 2008

ABC Learning held an EGM on June 6, 2006 to approve a $600 million institutional placement and after flying to Brisbane this was sent to Crikey subscribers one hour after the meeting.

ABC Learning might be the world's biggest childcare company but it hasn't got a clue how to handle public or investor relations if this morning's extraordinary general meeting of shareholders is any guide.

Chairman Sally-Anne Atkinson, the former Lord Mayor of Brisbane, was positively clueless and couldn't even answer basic questions such as how much debt the company will have once the $600 million placement is finalised?

Even worse, Sally was unwilling to defer to someone who did know something when it came to several key questions. For instance, when asked how much boutique investment bank Austock would pocket from handling the $600 million placement she claimed not to know because it hadn't been finalised yet.

When I complained about having Austock chairman Bill Bessemer on the board and the recent allocation of a 4.2% stake in Austock to ABC Learning founder and largest shareholder Eddie Groves, Sally denied there was any conflict of interest and said Eddie and Bill never participated in any discussion about hiring Austock. This was handled by independent director David Ryan who failed to show up this morning due to fog at Sydney Airport.

Right, so when Austock was paid $16 million for corporate advice and the $400 million equity raising when ABC Learning pulled together its great three way merger in 2004, Big Eddie and his old mate Bill had nothing to do with the negotiations. It was an obvious line, but I told the board it was time to "grow up" and stop tolerating such 1980s-style conflicts of interest.

Dressed in a black skivvy and brown jacket, Eddie came across as someone who hated fronting shareholders and treated them just like he treats the company's 12,000 staff – badly. Asked what proportion of staff own stock to align their interests, Eddie would only say that half are eligible but no-one could come up with an answer about staff equity participation. It sounds pretty low, which might partly explain why their staff regularly sledge the company.

When it came to the various resolution on shares, options and cash bonuses for the three executive directors – Eddie, his wife Le Neve and fellow long-term executive director Martin Kemp – I pointed out that they already owned more than $200 million worth of stock and didn't exactly need any more incentive. Why didn't this incentive scheme extend to the next tier of executives or is the $2.5 billion ABC Learning still being run like a three-person private company? We'll take it on board, was the mumbled response.

All today's resolutions were passed easily, so it marks an important milestone in the company's evolution because institutions now clearly control the operation with about 70% of all shares on issue. Therefore, it's about time ABC Learning behaved like an outfit that is there to serve independent shareholders.

Given that Eddie and Le Neve together dumped $32.8 million worth of shares – 13% of their holding – last December in a classic ASX announcement that was released at 3.55pm on a Friday, I asked Eddie to outline his future intentions.

As with every other issue, Eddie was dead keen to avoid answering and his supine chairman more than obliged when she declared she simply wouldn't allow him to answer. When asked the same question, Martin Kemp was prepared to say that he wanted to keep buying shares and did at every opportunity. So why didn't he participate in the placement at $7.30 a share, which is now underwater with the stock at $7.05? Sally, after consulting with the company secretary, claimed that he couldn't under the Corporations Law. That's funny, I asked the same question at the recent Nexus EGM and the chairman said that all directors had bought $5000 worth of shares in a placement.

After the meeting, Eddie did a rapid-fire runner to the exit where he was confronted by Julian Morrow and a crew from The Chaser. This is a man who seemingly doesn't like publicity or accountability – yet he's ultimately responsible for the welfare of more children around the world than anyone else on the planet.